Tardigraph
Development · predictions

What we said the genes would do, before we looked

A model of an embryo implies things about its genes. If cells divide on a particular schedule, the genes that run cell division should follow that schedule. So we wrote down eight predictions with hours attached, committed them, and only then opened the data — 62 single embryos, one per hour, sequenced whole. Two held. Five failed. The biggest failure rebuilt the model, which is the best thing a failed prediction can do.

8predictions, written and committed first
62single embryos to test them against
2held
5failed

The clock they were predicted against

Hours after the egg is laid, on a logarithmic scale because the interesting things crowd into the first day. The hatched band is a gap in the data: no embryo was sampled between 20 and 32 hours, so nothing can be said about what happens in there.

Each prediction, over what the genes actually did

The shaded bar on each chart is the window the prediction named. The line is the median expression of that set of genes, on a log scale, and the faint lines behind it are the individual genes. Open a card for what we said, what happened, and what changed because of it.

What this was worth

Five failures out of eight looks bad and is not. A prediction written after seeing the data cannot fail, and so cannot teach anything; these could, and one of them did something no amount of careful modelling would have.

The cell-cycle genes are the case. Our model had cells stopping division when the outer layer becomes an epithelium, at about 16 hours. The genes that run division stay at full cleavage level until about 38 hours, and only fall away between 38 and 50. That is not a detail — it changes how the animal gets from five hundred cells to its final thousand or so, and it moved the whole late half of the embryo onto a different schedule. We would not have found it by looking harder at the model.

Three of the failures say the same thing in different words. The polarity and junction genes never rise, because they are already there from the two-cell stage. The cells that move inside at 12–15 hours never transcribe the factors that normally license that move. The germline pool is not diluted but cleared, in one step, at 15–17 hours. The early embryo is not building what it needs as it goes: it is running on what the egg was loaded with, and the first large transcriptional change comes later than any of us expected.

One prediction was a fork rather than a guess. Nobody has published when the gut lumen opens, and our model can open it whenever we like — which makes it an assumption, and assumptions in this project have to be labelled. So we named two possibilities and the measurement that separates them. The ion-transport genes that would pump a lumen open are at their lowest exactly when the early hypothesis needs them high. The late opening it is.

How this is built
Data
62 single H. exemplaris embryos, one per hour, from Levin et al. 2016, mapped to the reference genome by us and joined to the daily series of Yoshida et al. 2017. Gene sets were chosen from the named orthologues in each family before the data were opened.
Built with
tools/genome/expr_predictions_test.py for the test, tools/expr_site.py for this page's data. The predictions are in docs/EXPRESSION-PREDICTIONS.md, and the commit that added them predates the commit that added the results.
Checked
Each prediction names in advance what would break it, and the verdicts here are against those stated conditions rather than against a reading made afterwards. E1's verdict is marked in the write-up as not blind: the cell-count mismatch had already made us suspect it.
Limits
One embryo per hour and no replicates, so a single odd embryo moves a point. No samples at all between 20 and 32 hours. After about 48 hours the embryos carry roughly a quarter of the early read depth and genes start dropping out, so falls late in development are partly a depth effect. Four embryos in this dataset are misdated and every test here was rerun without them; the verdicts stand.
More
development · the embryo model · findings · the claims